The Day Everything Changed

Scouts historical handbook cover imageOne year ago, I had been contacted by colleagues that a board meeting would be held in the following week to change membership policy at BSA with no discussion among, input from or consent of thousands of Chartering Organizations.  The meeting agenda had been (apparently) leaked to the press (since board meeting agendas are not usually subject to press release), and the “always hungry for a juicy story to fan the flames of vitriol and gossip” media had articles appearing on 1/28/2013.

The BSA acknowledged the situation and issued a statement which, one year later, can still be found online (http://www.scouting.org/membershippolicy.aspx):

Boy Scouts of America 
Monday, Jan. 28, 2013
Attributable to: Deron Smith, Director of Public Relations 

“For more than 100 years, Scouting’s focus has been on working together to deliver the nation’s foremost youth program of character development and values-based leadership training. Scouting has always been in an ongoing dialogue with the Scouting family to determine what is in the best interest of the organization and the young people we serve.  

“Currently, the BSA is discussing potentially removing the national membership restriction regarding sexual orientation. This would mean there would no longer be any national policy regarding sexual orientation, and the chartered organizations that oversee and deliver Scouting would accept membership and select leaders consistent with each organization’s mission, principles, or religious beliefs. BSA members and parents would be able to choose a local unit that best meets the needs of their families. 

“The policy change under discussion would allow the religious, civic, or educational organizations that oversee and deliver Scouting to determine how to address this issue. The Boy Scouts would not, under any circumstances, dictate a position to units, members, or parents. Under this proposed policy, the BSA would not require any chartered organization to act in ways inconsistent with that organization’s mission, principles, or religious beliefs.”(1)   [emphasis added]

 ###

Of course, the meeting’s agenda, now disclosed, brought many activists and scouters to Texas to camp at National’s front door, in view of TV cameras to deliver speeches, parade notable people from earlier press coverage and to drop off letters of concern, etc.  In retrospect, I feel it was the beginning of a year of pain and division among BSA – regardless of which side of the issue you supported more vocally.

Diversity flagsI also recognize that for many people, this was an exciting time — the possibility to end perceived (or real) injustices that had existed since the Dale verdict (or, arguably, longer). For them, scouting was never about adhering to one set of religious principles over any other set — religion (or non-faith) is a personal choice reserved for each individual and no one group’s beliefs should be forced on any individual.

For others, this wasn’t even about the membership policy itself — but the fact that National, after enduring firestorms of bad publicity multiple times would decide to host a meeting with a secretive (perceived) agenda to decide (unilaterally) such a big issue. Worse still, that their plan may have been to simply adopt the change with the following announcement — “The change has been made, learn to deal with it whether you like it or not”

slide 27While my unit was decidedly conservative in it’s views, the families were in shock that this could happen so swiftly and suddenly.  If a change of this magnitude could happen with no notice, what else could change with no consideration of the family’s (or Charter Org) feelings and opinions.  There was clearly a perception that “outsiders” had gotten to the board and that their opinion carried the only weight in the room (volunteers, parents and CO’s were of insignificance).

Phone calls, emails and letters were called for among social media groups on both sides of the issue — and a group of scouters representing major religious affiliations within scouting’s CO population who were also meeting in Texas on that fateful Monday had a chance to advise the board that change of that nature and magnitude should not be done in a relative vacuum.

Ultimately, on February 6, the 70 member executive Board announced that it needed “more time for a deliberate review” of the issues, perspectives and consequences of changing membership policies.

Aftermath, in hindsight

For some, this was a terrible set back — having hoped that in a three day meeting, the policy would have been changed by the board – quickly and decisively.  For others, this was a call to arms with roughly 100+ days until the vote on May 23rd, 2013.

Regardless of which side a scouter may have supported, BSA would never be the same (for better or worse).  Further, like the reverberation of a strongly struck bell, the echos and the ongoing changes continue to ring out a year later – possibly foretelling more changes yet to come.

IMGP6938I think scouting should be preoccupied with scoutcraft, woodcraft, camping and hiking, not sexuality or who tents with whom.   Further, adults arguing over such matters tend to be inelegant — raising tempers and emotions instead of simply agreeing to “tolerantly” disagree (“tolerance” = “the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with” NOT social conformity which is coerced adoption of behavior that is the same as the behavior of most other people in a society, group, etc.”)

Perhaps the membership issues should never have become an issue all those many years ago, and perhaps those families (like my own) should have known better than to assume we could be truly welcome within BSA — courtesy, kindness, duty to God are all really just cliches or platitudes within BSA at this point — just words reserved for people who adopt to the social norm within BSA and agree to stop rocking the boat.

Perhaps faith aligned outdoor adventure clubs would have been a better choice for people who take their faith development seriously:

Even secular organizations such as…

…where the absence of faith issues would have been clearer and less deceptive than BSA’s approach to religious life (i.e. you must practice faith to be a member, but you can never share your beliefs unless it is unoffensive to everyone around you).  The resulting mish-mash ends up being a pantheistic philosophy of religion where scouts pray to the “East Wind” during OA ceremonies and even during interfaith (no-faith) chapels at camporees and summer camp facilities.

Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 – “There is an appointed time for everything. And there is a time for every event under heaven—

A time to give birth and a time to die;
A time to plant and a time to uproot what is planted.
A time to kill and a time to heal;
A time to tear down and a time to build up.
A time to weep and a time to laugh;
A time to mourn and a time to dance.
A time to throw stones and a time to gather stones;
A time to embrace and a time to shun embracing.
A time to search and a time to give up as lost;
A time to keep and a time to throw away.
A time to tear apart and a time to sew together;
A time to be silent and a time to speak.
A time to love and a time to hate;
A time for war and a time for peace.

BSA has found that it is time to move on from where it has been.  Will you follow their trail blaze, or select another route?  Either way, this Eagle scout  wishes you the very best as you set out to continue your journey.

(1) – In August, 2013, this statement was issued in a FAQ package from BSA – “Will local units be able to deny membership to youth based on same-sex attraction? No youth may be denied membership in the Boy Scouts of America on the basis of same-sex attraction alone. [therefore, charter organizations whose mission, principles, or religious beliefs are inconsistent with this policy must either surrender their charter or adhere to the new policy … in contradiction to the statement offered in January 2013.] reference — http://www.scouting.org/filestore/training/membership/pdf/Unit_Implementation_FAQ.pdf

Advertisements

About Troop113

Our Troop # comes from Psalm 1:1-3 - describing the men we want our scouts to become
This entry was posted in News Item and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Day Everything Changed

  1. Steve Grove says:

    Part of this issue is the process of a modern organization (believing in absolute truths) moving to take the stance of a post-modern organization (at best only believing in a truth). In other words, it was inevitable once it dropped the foundation of truth and moved to individual inclusiveness. The focus shifted from the material, the ideal (and doing the work to get there, the individual paying the cost), to the acceptance of the individual (at any cost, the organization paying that cost). It speaks to the larger question of how people of faith take a stance in society, when our faith moves from being a dominant paradigm in society to a place of minority, or one of many (pluralism).

    That decision – stay the course on the boat we have, or jump ship to a new one that better represents who we are and gives us more control over the direction. Scouts isn’t what it was, because society has changed, and it has set itself up as a function of society. The church is not a function of society, but of faith, and in some ways stands apart – not of, but in society as an “other”. Having said that, though, if the church does not adapt to the flow of society around it, it becomes a rock in the midst of the river, water smashing upon it and wearing it down over time. The church, if it is to maintain a voice in a pluralistic society, has to change itself, not its truth and message, but how it communicates that message. Maybe it is time for a new wineskin!

  2. DChristopher says:

    My son was just finishing Webelos when the decision was made. Although we had several months of uncertainty, we were blessed to find a scout troop nearby that switched over to Trail Life. Same group of boys, same activities, same great scoutmaster. And, enough Trail Life troops in the metro area and state to do larger activities like summer camps. While I was disappointed and angry at the time, in retrospect, you’re right, there is a time for everything, and it was time for a split. It is time for Christians to have a scouting organization that doesn’t compromise. Let the pagans and the indifferent have BSA.

    • Troop113 says:

      Every family must make an informed decision — not based on emotions or bad information. Ultimately, your objectives for raising your sons (and daughters) should lead your family to the youth program that is a best fit based on stated goals and objectives. I’ve met a lot of people who try to re-shape BSA into something that it’s not…..BSA is a religiously pluralistic (all paths lead to God and are equally valid) organization that people try to squeeze into an evangelical Christian box. These families are better served in a competing program whose objectives align fully with the family’s expected outcomes. That just makes good sense. I genuinely wish you the very best with your time at Trail Life….you may like the articles at http://traillife113.wordpress.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s